This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Green, D. G. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Syntactic modeling and simulation

Research School of Biological Sciences Australian National University GPO Box 475, Canberra 2601 Australia

Formal languages are powerful modeling tools in their own right. Applications to biological processes such as growth and behavior emphasize the ability of syntactic models to capture organization clearly, concisely and accurately. This ability can be exploited by designing generic systems ("em bodiments") that simulate whole families of processes. Within an embodiment, specific models are defined by formal languages whose semantics relate to the real-world systems being modelled, rather than computational details. The most powerful embodiment systems are object-oriented hierarchies based on key theoretical concepts, such as directed graphs, cellular automata, and neural nets. Benefits of the embodiment approach include simplifying the development of simulation models; permitting the use of formal languages as modeling tools; and stimulating the develop ment of theory in particular areas of application.

Key Words: embodiment • expert systems • formal languages • generic simulation • parsing • syntactic models

SIMULATION, Vol. 54, No. 6, 281-286 (1990)
DOI: 10.1177/003754979005400605


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?